Democrats, Republicans, and Taxes
نویسنده
چکیده
I estimate the influence of political parties on state Tax Burdens over a forty-year period (1960-2000). Holding constant a large number of state and voter characteristic variables, I find that: (i) Tax Burdens are higher when Democrats control the state legislature compared to when Republicans are in control. (ii) The political party of the governor has little effect after controlling for partisan influences in the state legislature. I explain how both findings are consistent with median voter theory. My results suggest that after five years of Democratic control of the legislature, state government would be approximately 3 to 5 percent larger than if Republicans controlled the legislature during that same period, with the better specifications producing estimates in the higher end of this range. JEL Classifications: H1, H2 Revised, August 18, 2004 * Professor, Department of Economics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019; [email protected]; http://faculty-staff.ou.edu/R/William.R.Reed-1. I thank Jim Alt, Kevin Grier, Jim Poterba, and Dan Sutter for helpful comments; and Kodrat Wibowo for able research assistance.
منابع مشابه
Democrats, republicans, and taxes: Evidence that political parties matter
I estimate the influence of political parties on state Tax Burdens over a 40-year period (1960– 2000). Holding constant a large number of state and voter characteristic variables, I find that: (i) Tax Burdens are higher when Democrats control the state legislature compared to when Republicans are in control. (ii) The political party of the governor has little effect after controlling for partis...
متن کاملThe political costs of tax increases and expenditure reductions: Evidence from state legislative turnover
This paper estimates the political costs of increasing taxes and cutting expenditures for members of a legislature. It is found that both costs are individually significant, but that they are not significantly different. This coincides with the first order condition for maximization of the probability of reelection. Republican legislatures have a higher political cost for taxes, thus the party’...
متن کاملAmerican Decline in the Perspective of Democrats and Republicans: Otherization and Construction of American Identity in Election Speeches
American decline has received substantial attention from Iranian political and academic circles, with few analysts paying attention to the domestic debate on the concept. One of the overlooked aspects is the different ways that liberals and conservatives define and construct it. This difference is manifested in the perception of American identity and on the global role of the US, and intensifie...
متن کاملTactical asset allocation and presidential elections
Over the past 75 years, common stocks performed better under Democrats, while U.S. government bonds and Treasury (T) bills performed better under Republicans. Using a mean-variance framework, we find that Democrats provide better risk-reward opportunities for portfolios weighted toward stocks, while Republicans provide better tradeoffs for portfolios weighted toward government bonds and T-bills...
متن کاملThe politics of color: preferences for Republican red versus Democratic blue.
The present study reveals that Election Day differentially affects the color preferences of US Republicans and Democrats. Voters' preferences for Republican red and Democratic blue were assessed, along with several distractor colors, on and around the 2010 interim and 2012 presidential elections. On non-Election Days, Republicans and Democrats preferred Republican red equally, and Republicans a...
متن کامل